The higher lift generated by the Clark wing also gave the B17 a higher The Clark wing used in the B17 did give thisĪircraft a lower stall speed, but the thicker cord increased drag limiting top-end speed. This gave the B24 its increased operating speed and better fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the B24 demanded constant attention causing extreme fatigue in pilots on long missions. The B-17 was also an easier aircraft to fly inįormation. The B17 was a sedate aircraft and placed fewer demands on the flight deck crew. However, in the ETO, the B-24 operated with the B-17 which constrained theĪircraft's operating speed. The B-24 was a faster plane having a greater range and payload capacity. Many fighter groups tried to keep the P-38s or P-47s when the new P-51 became available.īomber pilots were no different when it came to trading in their B-24s for the B-17. When its time to change you're reluctant, you'reĬomfortable with what you have and don't see change as a good thing. You train in a particularĪircraft, fly it operationally, and you get to know its nuances and learn how to use them to your advantage. B17 vs B24 Comparisons of the Consolidated B-24 and the Boeing B-17Īsk any pilot what he thought was the best aircraft and his opinion may depend upon the type of aircraft he was trained in.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |